{"id":11436,"date":"2020-10-08T19:12:09","date_gmt":"2020-10-08T17:12:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/?p=11436"},"modified":"2026-05-11T18:18:11","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T16:18:11","slug":"china-censuran-a-mike-pence-y-no-a-kamala-harris-durante-el-debate-electoral","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/?p=11436","title":{"rendered":"China: Censuran a Mike Pence y no a Kamala Harris durante el debate electoral"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Se ha sabido que en China se censur\u00f3 al vicepresidente de los Estados Unidos, el republicano Mike Pence, pero no a la senadora dem\u00f3crata de California, y candidata a vicepresidente junto a Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, durante el debate vicepresidencial del mi\u00e9rcoles 7 de octubre. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&#8220;China censur\u00f3 los comentarios de Pence sobre China&#8221;<\/em>, inform\u00f3 Nathan VanderKlippe, corresponsal en Pek\u00edn de &#8216;The Globe and Mail&#8217; de Canad\u00e1. <em>&#8220;La se\u00f1al volvi\u00f3 cuando Harris empez\u00f3 a hablar de nuevo&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-twitter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">China censored Pence\u2019s comments on China. Signal returned when Harris began talking again. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/0VEMAqDA95\">pic.twitter.com\/0VEMAqDA95<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Nathan VanderKlippe (@nvanderklippe) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/nvanderklippe\/status\/1314020892742090753?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-twitter aligncenter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">What it looks like when China censors a vice-presidential debate after a question about China is asked &#8211; and then lifts the blackout when conversation appears set to move on. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/JgV5yEq7JU\">pic.twitter.com\/JgV5yEq7JU<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Nathan VanderKlippe (@nvanderklippe) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/nvanderklippe\/status\/1314027678647820292?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-twitter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\"><p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The CNN feed in China the moment debate turned to China. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/GuhqTDaEda\">pic.twitter.com\/GuhqTDaEda<\/a><\/p>&mdash; Nathan VanderKlippe (@nvanderklippe) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/nvanderklippe\/status\/1314020330789249024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">October 8, 2020<\/a><\/blockquote><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aqu\u00ed est\u00e1 el fragmento del debate durante el que los censores chinos cortaron la se\u00f1al mientras hablaba el vicepresidente. Apenas termin\u00f3 de hablar, restablecieron la se\u00f1al para que se pudiera escuchar a la dem\u00f3crata, Kamala Harris. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-youtube wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Esto es lo que el r\u00e9gimen chino censur\u00f3 durante el debate vicepresidencial\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/0pDn_KDm-mo?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La censura <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dni.gov\/index.php\/newsroom\/press-releases\/item\/2139-statement-by-ncsc-director-william-evanina-election-threat-update-for-the-american-public\" target=\"_blank\">se produjo<\/a> un mes despu\u00e9s de que el servicio de inteligencia de EE. UU.  acusara a China e Ir\u00e1n de intentar socavar las posibilidades de reelecci\u00f3n del presidente en ejercicio con la esperanza de que el elegido sea Joe Biden. Los rusos, por otro lado, est\u00e1n intentando <em>&#8220;denigrar al ex vicepresidente Biden por considerarlo un &#8216;elemento&#8217; anti-Rusia&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&#8220;Antes de las elecciones estadounidenses de 2020, los estados extranjeros continuar\u00e1n utilizando medidas de influencia, de una manera abierta o cerrada, en sus intentos de influir en las preferencias y perspectivas de los votantes estadounidenses, cambiar las pol\u00edticas de los Estados Unidos, aumentar la discordia en los Estados Unidos y socavar la confianza del pueblo estadounidense en nuestro proceso democr\u00e1tico&#8221;<\/em>, dijo el director del Centro Nacional de Contrainteligencia y Seguridad, William Evanina, el pasado mes de agosto. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&#8220;Tambi\u00e9n pueden intentar comprometer nuestra infraestructura electoral para una serie de posibles prop\u00f3sitos, como interferir con el proceso de votaci\u00f3n, robar datos confidenciales o poner en duda la validez de los resultados de las elecciones. Sin embargo, ser\u00eda dif\u00edcil para nuestros adversarios interferir o manipular los resultados de la votaci\u00f3n a gran escala&#8221;<\/em>, a\u00f1adi\u00f3 Evanina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Se sabe que los rusos intentaron interferir en las elecciones de 2016, y lo hicieron destinando entre 200.000 y 300.000 d\u00f3lares en anuncios de Facebook con el objetivo principal de sembrar la divisi\u00f3n y <em>&#8220;socavar la fe p\u00fablica en el proceso democr\u00e1tico de los EE. UU.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Autor: Tristan Justice <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Este art\u00edculo fue originalmente <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/10\/07\/china-censors-mike-pences-debate-comments-on-china-but-freely-broadcasts-kamala-harriss\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">publicado<\/a> en The Federalist<\/em> el<em> 7 de octubre de 2020. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Se ha sabido que en China se censur\u00f3 al vicepresidente de los Estados Unidos, el republicano Mike Pence, pero no a la senadora dem\u00f3crata de California, y candidata a vicepresidente junto a Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, durante el debate vicepresidencial del mi\u00e9rcoles 7 de octubre. &#8220;China censur\u00f3 los comentarios de Pence sobre China&#8221;, inform\u00f3 Nathan&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":11464,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,5],"tags":[810,684,1001,784],"class_list":["post-11436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mundo","category-noticias","tag-censura-es","tag-china-es","tag-elecciones-ee-uu-es","tag-pcch-es"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11436"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11907,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11436\/revisions\/11907"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/11464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinawatchinstitute.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}